CSR×SRCIT Framework Series
Published
17-3-2026
Type of Work
Other
Substack Blog series
Abstract
Professional higher education lacks structural frameworks for distinguishing work that proves capability from work that builds it when cognitive labour is AI-distributable. This series introduces complementary frameworks providing complete curriculum architecture: CSR (Context-Standard-Range) establishes programmatic structure distinguishing Secure assessment (verification at AQF standards) from Developmental work (trajectory-based building). SRCIT (Strategic, Relational, Creative, Interpretive, Technical) identifies five professional relationships with AI, each requiring different boundaries. Integration resolves what neither achieves alone: SRCIT specifies which mode of work; CSR determines when that work requires independent demonstration. Together they operationalise assessment validity in AI-capable professional contexts.
Notes
Files lodges with OSF
https://osf.io/xwgeh/overview
published at Substack https://colinwebber.substack.com/p/reconstructing-constructive-alignment
Citation
Webber, C. (2026). Reconstructing Constructive Alignment: The CSR Framework. Dr.C.Webber Substack. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XWGEH
Link to Published Work
https://colinwebber.substack.com/p/reconstructing-constructive-alignment