Submission Date
8-3-2026
Resource Type
Collection (a group of items)
File Format
File Size and Duration
13.6MB
Abstract
In this project, the student conducted a UX evaluation of an existing website. Employing a design thinking framework, the student identified areas for usability improvement. The goal was to enhance the user experience through a systematic and human-centred design approach. The results of this approach are summarised in this UX report.
Audience
General (G) - suitable for everyone
Language
English
References
Deiji Studios. (n.d.).€Deiji Studios.€h https://deijistudios.com G Grant, W. (2018).€101 UX principles: A definitive design guide. Packt Publishing.€h https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sae/detail.action?docID=5507764 G Google. (n.d.).€Deiji Studios concept store reviews. Google.€https://www.google.com/search?q=Deiji+Studios+Concept+Store+Reviews Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010).€Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design€(Rev. & updated ed.). Quarto Publishing Group USA.€h https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/sae/detail.action?docID=3399678 N Nielsen, J. (2024).€10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group.€h https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/ N Nielsen Norman Group. (2017, August 18).€Jakobˇs law of internet user experience€[Video]. YouTube.€h https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzb4mK9DiHM S St. Agni. (n.d.).€St. Agni.€h https://www.st-agni.com/ List of References
Recommended Citation
SAE University College. (2026). UX Report [Student Exemplar, SAE University College]. Creo.
Rights and Permissions
Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Copyright materials contained within this work are used under the Australian education copying scheme (Statutory Education Licence). DO NOT rehouse this work. Only link to this work. For all inquiries, please email library@sae.edu.au.