Abstract
The use of peer-reviewed texts is standard practice in academic papers. However, should a magazine written by and for practitioners be included in such articles? I argue that several factors can influence the creation of an academic paper, and that sources from various origins should be considered. Four points are explored that can affect the choice of references and from these, I posit that while robust analysis and depth are essential, there is no necessity to exclude non-peer-reviewed papers. This paper also raises the concern that the criteria for inclusion in the peer-review system may be a matter of control. Although the underlying intention behind such a system may be honourable, exclusion can occur from various perspectives. Further, by examining an instance where rigor was overlooked in the quest for new knowledge, this paper questions the notion of reliable information amid emerging technologies. Ultimately, when evaluating what to seek in an academic paper, it becomes clear that the quantity and quality of the researched sources should validate the work. While rigorous depth is necessary, it need not come exclusively from the peer-review process. Therefore, the paper concludes that new researchers would benefit more from learning effective research strategies and understanding the distinctions between different types of writing, rather than being penalised for including non-peer-reviewed articles.
Recommended Citation
Van Hout, Philip
(2026)
"Dying for a Clause: Arguing the Need for Creative Sources in Academic Papers,"
Imaginings: creative practice and inquiry: Vol. 2:
Iss.
1, Article 11.
Available at:
https://creo.sae.edu.au/imaginings/vol2/iss1/11